Disclaimer

The information contained in these pages is not meant to be taken as an endorsement of any medical approach, procedure, or treatment of any kind. If you have symptoms, seek immediate professional medical attention. The topics here are presented solely as potential options to be discussed with your medical professional.
WebCafé home arrow Tales from the Trenches
Neobladder Woman - anonymous PDF Print E-mail

Now, my story. I have been an orthotopic neobladder woman since April 1999. About a year before the surgery, I noticed faint traces of blood on tissue after urination post-exercise. This occurred only every few months, and since I was perimenopausal (54 years old), I attributed that as the cause.

However, in September 1998 the amount and frequency of bleeding increased. At an appointment with my gynecologist in October 1998, I related this troubling bleeding, stressing to her that the blood appeared to be bright red, and didnot look like menstrual blood. Instead, she scheduled me for a D&C and hysteroscopy. The diagnosis was endometrial hyperplasia, and I was told to continue taking the hormones I had been prescribed a year earlier to regulate irregular perimenopausal bleeding. I asked if she would be catheterizing me to take a urine sample, and she said that was not necessary. I reiterated that I could not be certain if the blood was coming from my vagina or my urethra. She ignored any suggestion that the source was anything but vaginal. I continued to have intermittent bleeding, especially after walking for exercise.

In January 1999 I started to have an occasional clot of blood during urination. So I decided to determine for myself the source of the problem. After the next urination, I did not completely empty my bladder. Holding a mirror under myself, I then forced a huge clot of blood from my urethra. After recovering quickly from this shock, I called my internist, and was in her office within the hour. Her assistant catheterized me and I filled a beaker with urine so red that there was no need to test for the presence of blood. My internist arranged for me to see a urologist the next day, who sent me for an IVP and urine cytology.

I had an outpatient cystoscopy on February 2, 1999, which revealed a 2-3 cm growth. However, much to my dismay, the urologist did not do a biopsy, but pronounced it to be malignant, based on his experience. Within the next several weeks I had an abdominal and pelvic catscan, and in-patient surgery to remove the tumor on February 23. To my horror, the tumor had grown in 3 weeks' time to 5-6 cm. A week later my urologist said that he had not been able to remove enough for pathology to determine whether the tumor had invaded the muscle wall, and that I would need to repeat the in-patient cystoscopy procedure. Panic-stricken by this turn of events, and sensing that I was dealing with a urologist who had graduated in the bottom-half of his class, I called my internist, relating this news, as well as discrepancies I had discovered in the pathologist's report. She set up an appointment the next day with a young Johns Hopkins-trained urologist, who assured me that he would have a Mayo-trained uro-pathologist at a different hospital read my slides. This pathologist determined that the cancer was indeed muscle-invasive. On March 15 in an out-patient procedure my new urologist biopsied my urethra and ureters and placed ureteral stents

.Finally, after many more tests and donating two units of my blood, I had an 8-hour operation on April 8, 1999, creating an orthotopic neobladder from both small and large intestine. Concurrently, I had a complete pelvic exenteration and pelvic lymph node dissection (16 lymph nodes removed). On the day of discharge on April 15,1999, I received the good news that there was no cancer found in any of the parts removed, except for the bladder. The tumor was TCC, Grade III/III, Stage 2a (only microscopic invasion into the muscle wall). My neobladder is a combination "Hautmann- Miami-Indiana pouch". This is the good news. The bad news is that I have always remained hyper-continent, meaning that I am unable to urinate at all, and must catheterize all the time, 4-6 times per day, every day. As a result of the constant cathing, I have frequent neobladder infections, one of which invaded my kidney. Initially I was on a 6-month checkup schedule, but last November I was "promoted" to annual checkups--urine cytology, blood work, IVP, chest x-ray, and pelvic and abdominal catscan.

I will soon celebrate 2 1/2 years post-diagnosis. My prognosis is excellent, with my urologist giving me a 95% chance of "cure". Normally, he said it would be about 80-85%, but since I never smoked, my outlook is more positive. Still, I do not think I will ever feel cured because in researching neobladders, I encountered a Japanese study in which one person had a bladder cancer recurrence after 20 years. But I try not to think of that, and live one day at a time! And even though my neobladder does not work as intended, I am still happy with my choice, and would make the same decision again. I feel very lucky, indeed.

back to neobladder for women
back to tales from the trenches
back to invasive bladder cancer

 

Last Updated ( Friday, 14 November 2008 )
 
Bladder Cancer WebCafé